The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 might be a good budget alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate2. The biggest shortcoming of the Kinergy appears to be loud noise. More reviews of the Kinergy: https://www.consumerreports.org/products/performance-all-season-tire/hankook-kinergy-4s2-402882/overview/ ---- Same story in snow traction as Kinergy 4S 2 X has an extra 160N in it compared to CrossClimate SUV. However in snow handling, Michelin managed to exert a much higher average lap time speed of 56.3 km/h compared to the 55.6 km/h that Kinergy 4S 2 X obtained. Overall, Kinergy 4S 2 X clearly outshine CrossClimate SUV in snow. CrossClimate SUV : 40.43M Michelin CrossClimate 2 38.14M Dry braking in meters, lower is better Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2 See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >> Dry Handling [s] Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 VS Michelin CrossClimate 2. by Burak Demir. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 VS Michelin CrossClimate 2: Both these tires are a part of the grand touring all-season tire category, which are engineered to provide a smooth ride and dependable all-season traction, as well as more responsive handling. 4S2 has a larger void ratio and Whereas, the Hankook 4S2 is superior in terms of handling in both wet and dry conditions, fuel, and tread economy, and road quietness. With both the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 and the Michelin Crossclimate 2, featuring innovative tread compounds, it's no surprise that we are witnessing a remarkable. Charakterystyka Na suchej nawierzchni Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni 83.6% Handling na suchej nawierzchni 88.9% Komfort akustyczny 92.4% Na mokrej nawierzchni Odporność na aquaplaning 86.9% Hamowanie na mokro 85% Handling na mokrej nawierzchni 77.8% Koszty P1GdFH.

hankook kinergy 4s vs michelin crossclimate